If Mortal Kombat 2 were remastered, it would look a lot like Mortal Kombat 11. Things like powers, the hud, and shooting in Mass Effect 1 were changed to be better suited to the next two games.
Mass Effect Legendary Edition fixed a lot of problems with the older games, from graphics to the worst driving system I've encountered.
When games are remastered for money, what doesn't work isn't kept, but what works is updated, plus new content is added. Still, if you're hoping for an upscaled version of Mortal Kombat 2, a remaster isn't going to deliver that. Mortal Kombat 2 has a simpler button-mashing system, and its combos aren't as strict. Mortal Kombat 2 and Mortal Kombat 9 have different fighting styles. I have played all of the Mortal Kombat games, and while the fighting has changed over the years, they are essentially just remade every time. Sometimes, things are left out in sequels, or the feel is different, but a remaster will not change that. Generally, sequels to fighting games follow the same formula and are essentially remasters. On the opposite side of things, Marvel's Spider-Man plays an awful lot like Spider-Man 2. My question is: Why did anyone vote for Mortal Kombat 2 or 9?Ī great example of a sequel feeling different is Street Fighter IV and Street Fighter V, which are clearly two different games. In my opinion, it deserves a remake since it would pave the way for a story mode like Mortal Kombat: Deception. A remake of this game is constantly requested it's too good not to be remade.
Although it might come as a surprise to some, Shaolin Monks won.